As you may have understood, those following few words aim to do two things: show how our fascination for Physics is natural, and how to raise that interest. However, let's first focus on our dear Hendrik
By a dark day of winter, Hendrik went back home and stepping into the darkness of his room, switched the light on. Miracle: and there was light! He reiterated the experiment successfully so many times that he gave up the idea of any divine intervention. He thought to himself: "that is only science!"
Nope! This wonder obviously comes from some very advanced technology, but is far from being science. Where technology implement our knowledge for our everyday life, science is only concerned by that pure knowledge. For instance, Physics is not going to explain how to make the switch but it will explain how it is working and why the laws of nature make it so that it can be turned on. Enlightened, Hendrik said with passion: "so, it was divine".
Is Science a religion?
Here again the border between what is natural and what is a miracle gets thiner and thiner. Some would even say that Physics and its laws have almost completely erased their religious beliefs leaving room for a rational formalism closer to intuition. However those would have done nothing more than create another God, more logical, more palpable, more human… A 2.0 version of a God.
But the foundation of all demonstration and calculations always lies in primary axiomes and postulates.
Science is not a religion.
The question is not whether or not to believe in the Big Bang. The aim is not to reach what is called real nor to say what it substantially is but simply to describe what we see. That big boom (we’re naming the Big Bang) Fred Hoyle was referring to, with sarcasm, is nothing more than a cosmological model aiming to describe the origin and the evolution of the Universe. Yes, a model. One among others. That one working better than others: it is consistent with most of our current observations. The Big Bang is more of a geek equation than a creation at the origine of space-time. At the end of the day, the main goal in Physics would be to find the phenomena that can not be explained by the current model and would lead to a better one. (For sure the dude that finds that would get a Nobel prize.)...And so on and so forth.
From that moment on, when Hendrik understood the ephemeral nature of our reflexion's base, he couldn't help thinking: "what is our science really worth?"
Physics is beautiful. That's indeed what makes it so sexy.
Let's take an example: rainbows. No one can claim to be insensitive to the beauty of the colors of the light spectrum (not even Hendrik). From the child to the old man, we all are mesmerized by its beauty.
Of course the physicist doesn't always think: "well, a rainbow is a phenomenon of optics that displays a spectrum of light due to the sun shining on droplets of moisture in the atmosphere." He just doesn't. However, be certain that his scholarly contemplation expands by a thousands times his imagination's horizon.
That way, free from any spiritual or metaphysical thoughts, let's curiosity be the fuel to unwrap the mysteries of the Universe and its phenomena; the link between that knowledge and beauty would come naturally. In the end, what matters is our ability to wonder, our ability to keep looking at the world the way we used to do as a child discovering the world around him…
NB: The man on the cover could not in any case be mistaken with our dear Hendrik…
Sophie incognito
Sophie incognito
















